Skip to main content
Housing & Property
GB_EW

Tenancy Deposit Withheld

In England a landlord or agent taking a security deposit for most assured shorthold tenancies must place it in a government-approved deposit protection scheme and give the tenant prescribed information within 30 days. If the rules are broken, the tenant can go to the county court, which can order the deposit to be returned and a sum of one to three times the deposit to be paid. Where the deposit was protected properly, the scheme's own free dispute service decides how it is divided.

Last checked 2026-10-143 scenarios

What is this?

In England a landlord or agent taking a security deposit for most assured shorthold tenancies must place it in a government-approved deposit protection scheme and give the tenant prescribed information within 30 days. If the rules are broken, the tenant can go to the county court, which can order the deposit to be returned and a sum of one to three times the deposit to be paid. Where the deposit was protected properly, the scheme's own free dispute service decides how it is divided.

Who can use it

Tenants of assured shorthold tenancies in England whose deposit has been withheld, under-protected or not protected at all. Wales and Scotland have their own schemes and rules, and lodgers or 'excluded occupiers' who share their landlord's home fall outside deposit protection altogether.

What problems it addresses

A deposit held back for cleaning or damage with no itemised breakdown; no check-out report or inventory; a landlord who never protected the deposit or never sent the prescribed information; deductions for fair wear and tear; a landlord who stops replying once you move out.

When it is appropriate

You have moved out (or are about to) and the deposit has not been returned in full. Deposit scheme adjudication is usually the fastest and cheapest route where the deposit was protected; the court route is for cases where the legal requirements were broken, or where the landlord will not engage.

How the procedure begins

Work out which scheme holds the deposit — the protection certificate or your tenancy paperwork will say. Ask the landlord in writing for an itemised statement of what is being deducted. If the deposit was protected, raise a dispute with the scheme. If it was not protected at all, or the prescribed information was never served, the county court route under section 214 of the Housing Act 2004 is open to you.

What the decision-maker can do

A deposit scheme adjudicator decides how the disputed sum should be divided between landlord and tenant, on the evidence, without a hearing. Where the landlord has not protected the deposit or not served the prescribed information, the county court can order the return of the deposit and payment of one to three times its amount.

Remedies and outcomes available

Return of the deposit or part of it; an itemised, evidence-based decision from the scheme adjudicator; and, where the protection rules were broken, an additional court-ordered payment of one to three times the deposit. Compensation for the failure to protect is not a punishment you have to prove harm for — it follows from the breach.

When to consider a different route

If you shared your landlord's home as a lodger, you are likely to be an excluded occupier: deposit protection does not apply and the route is a small claim for money owed. If the deduction is really a dispute about disrepair or an illegal eviction, those are separate claims. In Wales and Scotland the schemes, deadlines and remedies differ, so follow the rules for where the property is.

Costs, fees and timeframes

Scheme dispute resolution is free to both parties and commonly produces a decision within a few weeks to a couple of months. A county court claim involves a court fee on a published scale — check GOV.UK's current fee table — and can be started online. Court claims take longer than scheme adjudication.

Step by step

  1. 1

    Find out whether the deposit was protected

    Ask the landlord or agent which scheme holds it and for the certificate and prescribed information. If they cannot show it, that is important evidence in itself.

  2. 2

    Ask for an itemised breakdown in writing

    Request a written statement of each deduction with the amounts. Keep a copy of your request and the reply.

  3. 3

    Use the scheme's dispute service

    If the deposit is protected, submit a dispute through the scheme, setting out what you accept and what you reject, with your evidence attached.

  4. 4

    Consider the county court if the rules were broken

    Where the deposit was never protected, or the prescribed information was not served in time, seek advice on a section 214 claim for return of the deposit plus one to three times its amount.

  5. 5

    Keep the paper trail until it is finished

    Retain all correspondence, the adjudicator's decision and the payment records. If a court order is not paid, enforcement is the next step.

Evidence and documents

The tenancy agreement, the deposit protection certificate and prescribed information if you have them, your bank or payment record showing the deposit was paid, the check-in and check-out inventory or report, dated photographs, the itemised deductions you were given, and all messages with the landlord or agent.

  • • Signed tenancy agreement
  • • Deposit protection certificate and prescribed information
  • • Bank statement or receipt showing the deposit payment
  • • Check-in inventory or report and check-out report
  • • Dated photographs of the property at move-in and move-out
  • • The landlord's itemised deduction statement
  • • Emails, texts and letters with the landlord or agent
  • • Cleaning or repair invoices you were sent

Authoritative sources

Frequently asked questions

How much compensation can the court order?+

Where the deposit protection requirements were not met, the court must order the deposit to be returned and a payment of between one and three times the deposit. The court has discretion on the multiplier, so the outcome is not guaranteed to be the maximum.

Is the scheme's decision binding?+

Deposit scheme adjudication is binding on the parties once both sides agree to it — it is designed to keep disputes out of court. If one side will not take part, or the deposit was not protected at all, the court route is the alternative.

Can the landlord charge for cleaning?+

Only where the tenancy agreement allows it and the property was left in a worse condition than the check-in record shows, allowing for normal wear and tear. Charges must be evidenced with an itemised breakdown and, where appropriate, invoices.

How long do I have to bring a claim?+

The position depends on the claim: court claims of this kind are commonly treated as subject to a six-year limitation period, but advice should be taken on your dates. Scheme disputes must be raised within the scheme's own window, so do not delay.

I do not have a written tenancy agreement — can I still claim?+

Yes. A tenancy can exist without a written agreement, and deposits still generally need protecting. Bank records, messages about rent, and utility or council tax documents can all help show the tenancy existed.

This is general information about tenancy deposits in England, not legal advice. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland use different schemes and rules, and lodger or excluded occupier arrangements fall outside deposit protection.

The scenarios

Different circumstances, decisions and outcomes for the same service — from a clean-cut case to one where this route is not the right fit.

Scenario A
Straightforward case
England (deposit scheme adjudication)

A spotless flat, a £340 cleaning bill, and no invoice to go with it

A typical case — fictional illustration

The situation

Aisha rented a one-bedroom flat in Leeds for two years and paid a £950 deposit, which the letting agent protected with a deposit scheme. She left the flat cleaner than she found it: she hired a professional cleaner, took dated photographs of every room, and kept the check-out report, which recorded no damage. Three weeks later the agent emailed that £340 was being retained for 'cleaning and gardening'. There were no invoices, no itemised breakdown and no mention of the garden she never had access to. When she pushed back, the agent replied that the deposit was 'held at the landlord's discretion'.

The problem they face

Aisha is £340 down with no explanation she can test. The agent's line about 'discretion' sounds authoritative and is designed to end the conversation, but the deposit is held under rules, not at a landlord's discretion.

Why this service may help

Because the deposit was protected, the scheme that holds it offers free dispute resolution. An adjudicator decides how the disputed amount should be divided on the evidence, without a hearing. Crucially, the burden works in Aisha's favour where the landlord cannot produce evidence: deductions have to be justified, itemised and supported, and the check-in and check-out records are the starting point.

How the process works

Aisha raises a dispute through the scheme holding her deposit, using its online form. She sets out what she accepts and what she rejects, attaches the check-out report, photographs, the cleaner's invoice and the agent's emails, and asks the adjudicator to decide. The landlord is invited to put its evidence in. The adjudicator then issues a decision allocating the deposit, and the scheme releases the money accordingly.

Evidence and documents

The tenancy agreement, the deposit protection certificate, the check-in and check-out reports, dated photographs from move-in and move-out, the professional cleaner's invoice, all emails with the agent, and any inventory notes about the garden or its condition.

Possible outcomes

The likely outcome is that most or all of the £340 is returned, because unexplained deductions without invoices are hard to justify, and 'discretion' is not a lawful basis for keeping someone's money. It is also possible the adjudicator allows a modest amount if the landlord produces, say, a check-in record showing a different starting condition. Scheme adjudication is binding once both parties take part.

Costs and timescales

Dispute resolution through the scheme is free to both sides. Decisions usually come through within a few weeks to a couple of months. There is no court fee and no hearing, which is why this is nearly always the first route to try where the deposit was protected.

Important limitations

The scheme only decides the money it holds, so it cannot deal with compensation for the failure to protect a deposit or with wider claims — those are court matters. The adjudicator works on documents rather than arguments in person, so a well-evidenced file matters more than a persuasive letter. And if Aisha had simply refused to engage and moved on, she would have lost the chance.

Practical next steps

Aisha should dispute formally through the scheme, write a short factual statement of what she disputes and why, attach the cleaner's invoice and the photographs, and ask the agent in writing for the itemised breakdown and any invoices. If the agent will not identify which scheme holds the deposit, that is itself worth noting and following up.

Sources

Scenario B
More complex situation
England (county court, section 214 Housing Act 2004)

The deposit that was never protected — and a landlord who calls it a "holding fee"

A typical case — fictional illustration

The situation

Tomasz rented a three-bedroom house in Nottingham from a private landlord. He paid £1,200 as a deposit, took no written tenancy agreement because the landlord said 'we don't need paperwork, you seem like a decent bloke', and stayed for three years, renewing once. When he moved out, the landlord kept £700 for a door he says Tomasz broke — Tomasz has photographs from move-in day showing the same dented panel — and claimed an extra month's rent. Tomasz then spent eight months working abroad and came back to find no deposit certificate had ever existed. The landlord's position is that the £1,200 was a 'holding fee' to secure the property, not a deposit, and that in any event Tomasz left it too late.

The problem they face

Tomasz is trying to recover £700 that he says was never his damage, in a case where there is no written tenancy agreement, no deposit certificate, and a timing argument stacked against him. The landlord has also reframed the payment to sidestep the protection rules altogether.

Why this service may help

Where a security deposit for an assured shorthold tenancy is not protected in an approved scheme within 30 days, and the prescribed information is not given, the tenant can apply to the county court. The court can order the deposit to be returned and a further sum of one to three times the deposit. Whether the money was a deposit rather than a 'fee' turns on what it was actually for — a sum held against possible damage or unpaid rent is a deposit in substance whatever it is called.

How the process works

Tomasz's first task is to establish the facts: which scheme, if any, holds the money, and when the landlord protected it. He then seeks advice on a section 214 application to the county court, which is started using the court's own forms. His evidence of the tenancy without a written agreement comes from bank transfers, utility accounts, council tax records and messages. The renewal is a key detail: if a new deposit was taken on renewal, or prescribed information was not re-served for the renewal, the 30-day requirement can bite again.

Evidence and documents

Bank statements showing the £1,200 payment and the rent, council tax and utility records in his name, messages arranging the tenancy and the renewal, his move-in photographs of the damaged door, the landlord's letter claiming £700 and the extra month, and any statement from the old landlord's scheme showing no record of a protected deposit.

Possible outcomes

If the court finds the requirements were breached, it must order the deposit to be returned and a payment of between one and three times the deposit — a range that reflects the court's discretion, not a guaranteed maximum. The landlord may also be barred from using the accelerated possession procedure until the position is regularised. Against that, it is possible the court treats part of the money as a genuine fee, or finds the claim out of time, in which case the outcome could be limited to the £700 dispute.

Costs and timescales

A county court claim involves a court fee on a published scale — check GOV.UK's current fee table — and cases of this kind commonly take several months. Legal advice is worth taking, though it is not compulsory. If the deposit is in a scheme after all, the free adjudication route is faster and cheaper than court, so that should be checked first.

Important limitations

The limitation position needs checking: claims of this type are commonly treated as subject to a six-year limitation period, but advice should be taken for the actual dates. A court's discretion on the multiplier means the outcome is not guaranteed. Deposit protection applies to assured shorthold tenancies; if a landlord lived in the property or the occupier was a lodger, the rules are different. 'Holding fees' are a genuinely different thing from deposits, so the label matters less than the purpose, but it has to be argued with evidence.

Practical next steps

Tomasz should first establish whether the money was ever protected by asking the landlord in writing for the scheme name, certificate and prescribed information, then take advice on a section 214 claim. He should assemble the tenancy evidence now — bank records, utility and council tax accounts, messages — because the absence of a written agreement makes those documents the backbone of the case.

Sources

Scenario C
Limitations and an alternative route
England (small claims comparison)

A room in the landlord's own home — where deposit protection simply does not apply

A typical case — fictional illustration

The situation

Ellie is 23 and moved into a spare room in a house in Bristol where the landlord, Mrs Okafor, also lives. She paid £600 'deposit' in cash and had a friendly arrangement: rent by bank transfer, no written agreement, and a message saying 'two months' notice either way'. After five months a job move meant she left with three weeks' notice. Mrs Okafor kept the £600, saying Ellie had broken her word and that she had lost rent. Ellie found the deposit protection rules online and assumed she could claim one to three times the deposit in court. She told her friends she was 'owed £1,800'.

The problem they face

Ellie has £600 held back that she thinks was wrongly kept, and she has built a wrong expectation about how much she can recover. The route she has pinned her hopes on does not apply to her living arrangement, and that gap between expectation and remedy is the real problem here.

Why this service may help

This is the case where the headline route is unavailable and a different one fits. Where the occupier shares living accommodation with the landlord — a lodger or 'excluded occupier' — the tenancy deposit protection rules generally do not apply, so there is no one-to-three-times payment to claim. What remains is a straightforward contractual claim: a small sum of money held that she says was not owed, which is exactly what the small claims procedure is designed for.

How the process works

The claim is for breach of the agreement about the deposit, based on what was actually agreed in the messages and the payments. Ellie should first write a short, dated letter before claim setting out what she says is owed and why, giving a deadline to pay. If nothing comes back, she can issue a small claim in the county court, using the messages and bank records as evidence, and the case is normally decided on documents or at a short hearing without lawyers.

Evidence and documents

The message setting out the notice arrangement, bank statements showing the rent and the £600 payment, any messages about why the deposit was kept, the date she moved out and the room's condition, and a record of her attempts to resolve it.

Possible outcomes

A realistic outcome is a negotiated return of part or all of the £600, or a small claims judgment for the money plus the court fee if she wins. It is also genuinely possible she recovers nothing: if the agreement really was two months' notice, the landlord may be entitled to set off some rent, and a court would look at what was agreed rather than what feels fair. There is no entitlement to a statutory penalty in a lodger arrangement.

Costs and timescales

A small claim involves a court fee on a published scale and is designed for people without lawyers. Cases commonly resolve within a few months, and many are settled by the letter before claim alone. Mediation through the court's small claims process is offered free in many cases and often ends the dispute quickly.

Important limitations

Deposit protection, the scheme adjudication service and the one-to-three-times payment do not apply to lodgers and excluded occupiers, and claiming them would fail. The claim is limited to what was actually agreed and to losses the landlord can justify, so the sum recoverable may be smaller than expected and costs are not normally recoverable. Cash payments are harder to evidence, which makes the messages and bank records more important.

Practical next steps

Ellie should stop describing the money as a penalty she is owed and reframe it as a contractual sum, then send a short letter before claim with the messages and bank records attached. She should ask for the specific rent the landlord says was lost, and be prepared to accept a partial return rather than spending more on fees than the sum at stake.

Sources

Where to go next

If this looks like your situation, find the body that handles it in your country, or check whether another route suits you better.

Cookie Preferences

We use essential cookies to keep you logged in and the site secure. We also use optional cookies for analytics, preferences, and affiliate tracking. You can accept all or refuse non-essential cookies. Read our Cookie Policy for details.

Welcome to JusticeLeague.online

Your global guide to claim authorities, filing portals, and legal navigation.

New here? We've put together a quick walkthrough that covers everything from finding the right authority to filing a claim, uploading evidence, and tracking your progress.

📋 Find Authorities

Search 100+ claim organisations worldwide

📁 File a Claim

Step-by-step intake with AI triage

📚 Learn

Free courses on your rights

🔒 Evidence Vault

Private, encrypted evidence timeline